Today is: Tue, Oct 17, 2017
 
What's Inside
Home
Book Reviews
Business
Calendar of Events
Classifieds
Community
Crime Stoppers
Editorial
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Features
Global
Government
Health
Home and Garden
Humor
Kidz Korner
Letters to the Editor
Miscellaneous
Musings with Mari
Op-Ed
People
Photo Gallery
Religion
Sound Bites
Sports
Travel & Leisure

Resources
About Us
Contact Us
Register
Login
Forum
Links
Submit News

Affiliates
 
Site Design by:


Home-->Environment-->Coalition says, stop tampering with WRDA
 
Coalition says, stop tampering with WRDA staff
Updated: 2013-10-21 16:12:38
A spokesperson for the Missouri Coalition for the Environment is calling attention to new corruption and cronyism on Capitol Hill. This time it is in reference to changes to the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) that they say contains extremely harmful provisions that significantly would undermine laws protecting rivers, lands and wildlife.

WRDA is what the U.S. calls its dysfunctional and arduous method of authorizing projects that affect our rivers. WRDA authorizes studies and projects within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) primary mission areas: 1) commercial navigation; 2) flood risk management; and 3) aquatic ecosystem restoration. The projects that are authorized, historically through an earmarking process, include locks, dams, levees, beach sand replenishment, river island building and channel dredging. WRDA can also affect, through the Corps permitting process, public and private structures and infrastructure near, over, or under rivers. Mission area #3 gets the fewest resources and the most neglect, according to Kat Logan Smith, Coalition director.

The House's WRRDA, like the Senate's WRDA developed this summer, contains provisions that limit the review of Corps projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other environmental laws, including the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act. These "streamlining" provisions, Smith reports, will make it much harder to protect wildlife habitat, water quality, wetlands, streams, and communities from harmful Corps projects.

In addressing this issue with members of Congress, Smith suggests the following:

  • Strike the so-called "streamlining" provisions in this bill - Section 103 - that gut meaningful environmental reviews.

  • Amend the bill to require the Corps to use nonstructural and restoration measures where they can provide an appropriate level of flood damage protection and benefits. Let the river's wetlands and floodplains do their job of sponging flood waters where feasible.

  • Amend the bill to require the Corps to periodically evaluate and update operations plans and water control manuals for large-scale Corps projects. As time goes by, situations change and decisions should consider the most current information and new knowledge.

  • Amend the bill to require mitigation consistent with recommendations made by the nation's fish and wildlife experts pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Mitigation for wildlife that fails, is no mitigation at all.

  • Amend Section 216 of the bill to eliminate the increased subsidization of the Olmstead Locks and Dam project to 75%. Jacking up taxpayers share would add over $350 million to the taxpayers' current burden for this already overpriced $3.1 billion project. See the Post Dispatch story on this financial black hole that the House is prepared to pitch taxpayers into.

Go Back



Comments

You are currently not logged in. If you wish to post a comment, please first log in.

 ThreadAuthorViewsRepliesLast Post Date 

No comments yet.


 

 

 

 

 

Home  |  Login  |  Contact Us  |  Forum

2013 - 2014 Voice of the Ozarks